USPTO serial 76587375
THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA MICRODUSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3561448Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA MICRODUSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | MOP TYPE DUSTER COMPRISED OF MICROFIBER FILAMENTS, ATTACHED TO A PLASTIC OR WOOD HANDLE FOR USE IN DUSTING THE INTERIOR OF A HOME OR OFFICE, OR A VEHICLE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA CAR DUSTER COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA MICRODUSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |