USPTO serial 76587646
HYDRAULIC BI-FOLD DOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3012320Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HYDRAULIC BI-FOLD DOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard O. Bartz
Richard O. Bartz BARTZ & BARTZ6950 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 119EDINA, MN 55435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Industrial, commercial and residential doors, namely metal doors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |