Drawing for V.I.C.

USPTO serial 76587840

V.I.C.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with V.I.C.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C. WRAY LAW OFFICES OF JAMES C. WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE ROADSUITE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles for transportation on land, air or water, namely, motor propelled and self-propelled vehicles for use on land and on water and motor propelled and glider aircraft; parts used in vehicles for transportation on land, air or water, namely, motor propelled and self-propelled vehicles for use on land and on water and motor propelled and glider aircraftABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 23, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 23, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 23, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance