USPTO serial 76587906
EN VOGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EN VOGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EN VOGUE SCULPTURED NAIL SYSTEMS INC.
Langley, B.C. V2Y 1N2, CA
Other trademarks owned by EN VOGUE SCULPTURED NAIL SYSTEMS INC.
EN VOGUE SCULPTURED NAIL SYSTEMS INC.
Langley, B.C. V2Y 1N2, CA
Other trademarks owned by EN VOGUE SCULPTURED NAIL SYSTEMS INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Adhesives used for a applying artificial fingernails; nail varnish, nail care products, namely, false nails; artificial fingernails; nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer, and glitter, toe and finger spacers, nail polish pens; tips, glue and lacquers, all for nail grooming; artificial fingernails and glue in kit form; emery boards, emery paper, emery cloth and emery, all for nail grooming; nail care preparations, nail strengthening, repair and conditioning preparations, brush-on gels and resins for nail, curable nail gels; nail polish, nail varnish, nail base coats, nail top coats, quick dry nail coats; nail coating removers; artificial nails; nail adhesives, adhesive tip removers; false nail enamel removers; deep moisturising lotion for pedicures; nail forms; cuticle cream, removers and oils; preparations and substances all for the hair, namely, preparations for colouring the hair; preparations for conditioning the hair; cosmetics; chemicals used in industry and photography, in particular light hardening gel for use with gel nails; adhesives for attaching artificial fingernails and/or eyelashes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Ultraviolet lamps not for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EN VOGUE SCULPTURED NAIL SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EN VOGUE SCULPTURED NAIL SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named EN VOGUE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |