USPTO serial 76588221
GOVSOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3084102Status 790Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2006
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GOVSOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reston, VA, US
Herndon, VA, US
Herndon, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles B. Kramer
GOVSOURCE, INC.1897 PRESTON WHITE DRIVERESTON, VA 20191Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [computer facilities management services;] providing temporary professional and administrative staffing in the field of information technology[; wholesale and retail distributorship services, namely, reseller services for computer software, computer hardware and peripherals and accessories therefore; procurement assistance, namely, purchasing computer and telecommunication equipment for others] | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | [installation of voice, data and video equipment for others] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer and information technology consulting services; computer services, namely, computer network and systems engineering, computer project management consulting, computer information systems design and implementation for others[, and computer software development; information technology infrastructure development; ] computer project management services; [ developing information technology infrastructures for others; ] computer technology consultation; [computer consultation in the fields of design, implementation and management of computer network security systems;] computer software and computer database engineering services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, and customer help desk technical support services, namely, [ troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; computer support services, namely, computer software maintenance;] business process consulting services; computer consulting services for planning, design, and analysis of information processes, systems, and business reengineering; consulting services in the field of assistive technology; consulting services in the field of electronic enterprise solutions; consulting and design services for computer hardware and software systems integration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GovSource, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GovSource, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GovSource, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GOVSOURCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 15, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |