USPTO serial 76588354
CHESTNUT HILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3009710Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHESTNUT HILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harriet E. Perkins
HARRIET E. PERKINS Woodwock Washburn LLP2929 Arch StreetCira Centre, 12th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | accessories, namely, duffle bags, tote bags, briefcases and backpacks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | men's and women's clothing, namely, woven tops, knit tops, headwear and outerwear, namely, vests, coats, jackets, pullovers and wind resistant jackets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |