Drawing for PENTHOUSE EXECUTIVE CLUB

USPTO serial 76588435

PENTHOUSE EXECUTIVE CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PENTHOUSE EXECUTIVE CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing live dance performances, model searches and special appearances by young women selected as centerfolds or annual award winnersACTIVEJun 3, 2003
043Restaurant, night club and bar servicesACTIVEJun 3, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 9, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Mar 2, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 9, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Oct 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 7, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 6, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 6, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance