USPTO serial 76588574
TRIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Osaka-shi, Osaka, JP
Osaka-shi, Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald W. Hanson
DONALD W HANSON ARMSTRONG, KRATZ, QUINTOS ET AL1725 K ST NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair waving preparations; hair dyes; hair colorants; soaps; hair shampoos; hair rinses; non-medicated hair treatment preparations; hair lotions; hair spray; and hair styling preparations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |