USPTO serial 76588679
ACMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3737255Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JENA, DE
73447 OBERKOCHEN, DE
73447 OBERKOCHEN, DE
73447 OBERKOCHEN, DE
73447 OBERKOCHEN, DE
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS MEDITEC AG
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS AG
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS AG
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS AG
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS MEDITEC AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ACMASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |