USPTO serial 76588690
GEMPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3047608Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GEMPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BLUE SPRINGS, MO
Mission, KS
Mission, KS
Mission, KS
MINEOLA, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Hovey
THOMAS H VAN HOOZER Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 100084 Corporate WoodsOverland Park, KS 66210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPACKAGED CONTAINERS OF PROCESSED NUTS, CANDIED NUTS, FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOODS,NUT-BASED SNACK FOODS, DRIED FRUIT AND PROCESSED EDIBLE SEEDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2004 |
| 030 | PREPACKAGED CONTAINERS OF CANDY, COOKIES, CRACKERS, PRETZELS, TEA, COFFEE, CHOCOLATE, CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS, CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS, RICE BASED SNACK FOODS AND WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GOURMET GEMS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GOURMET GEMS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GOURMET GEMS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GOURMET GEMS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GLJ, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GEMPAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |