USPTO serial 76593113
LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Ostfeld
DAVID M OSTFELD ADAMS & REESE LLP1221 MCKINNEY ST STE 4400ONE HOUSTON CTRHOUSTON, TX 77010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Safety training software for industrial and commercial installations, namely software for collecting and analyzing behavior observation data from employees | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 2004 |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of behavior based safety, namely, a methodology of behavior based safety that implements proprietary tools to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of a behavior-based safety process, which drastically reduces the time and manpower needed to maintain a successful behavior-based safety process | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |