Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76593113?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76593113. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76593113, the listed owner(s) include: Integrated Performance Technologies, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 76593113?

Serial number 76593113 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY?

LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY (76593113) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY?

The public record lists International Classes: 009, 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76593113

LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: May 19, 2004
Status date: Oct 30, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAN BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Integrated Performance Technologies, Inc.
The Woodlands, TX
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Performance Technologies, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Ostfeld

DAVID M OSTFELD ADAMS & REESE LLP1221 MCKINNEY ST STE 4400ONE HOUSTON CTRHOUSTON, TX 77010

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Safety training software for industrial and commercial installations, namely software for collecting and analyzing behavior observation data from employees	ACTIVE	Jan 8, 2004
042	Consulting services in the field of behavior based safety, namely, a methodology of behavior based safety that implements proprietary tools to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of a behavior-based safety process, which drastically reduces the time and manpower needed to maintain a successful behavior-based safety process	ACTIVE	Jan 8, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 31, 2006	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 30, 2006	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 30, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 30, 2006	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jun 5, 2006	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Jun 5, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
May 26, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
May 26, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 25, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 23, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
May 15, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 15, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 14, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Oct 25, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 24, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 25, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Dec 21, 2004	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED	—
Dec 20, 2004	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Dec 20, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 3, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—