Drawing for INITIAL TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76597147

INITIAL TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INITIAL TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Lee

DARIN MARGULES TYRE KAMINS KATZ GRANOF & MENES1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording and transmission of sound and images, namely, DVD machines, digital consumer entertainment units comprising video display, video recorder, video player, audio recorder, audio player, audio speakers or a combination thereof; portable video and audio entertainment units comprising video display, video recorder, video player, audio recorder, audio player, audio speakers or a combination thereof video and audio entertainment units for vehicles comprising of video display, video recorder, video player, audio recorder, audio player, audio speakers or a combination thereof; home theater systems comprising video display, video recorder, video player, audio recorder, audio player, audio speakers or a combination thereof; video and computer monitors, LCD televisions, LCD television combined with DVD machine, and related accessories; namely, power cables and adapters batteries, carrying cases, audio/video cables, remote controls, and headphonesACTIVEMay 3, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 9, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 8, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 10, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance