USPTO serial 76598299
HALDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2007
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HALDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE10388 Stockholm, SE
Kansas City, MO, SE
SE10388 Stockholm, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Ainsworth
Brian E. Ainsworth Price Heneveld LLP3400 Innovation Ct. SEP.O. Box 2567Grand Rapids, MI 49501-2567Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | LAND VEHICLES; BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR LAND VEHICLES; BRAKES FOR LAND VEHICLES; COMPONENTS FOR BRAKES AND BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, BRAKE ACTUATORS, BRAKE ADJUSTORS, BRAKE DISCS, DISC BRAKES, BRAKE DRUMS, DRUM BRAKES, BRAKE LININGS, BRAKE PADS; TRANSMISSIONS AND TRANSMISSION MECHANISMS FOR LAND VEHICLES; TRANSMISSION COUPLING FOR LAND VEHICLES IN THE NATURE OF CLUTCHES AND CLUTCH MECHANISMS; PARTS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, AIR DRYERS AND AIR CONDENSERS FOR REMOVING WATER, OIL, AND CONTAMINANTS FROM COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEMS OF LAND VEHICLES; SUSPENSION SYSTEMS FOR LAND VEHICLES; DRIVE TRAINS FOR LAND VEHICLES; TORQUE TRANSFER COUPLERS, NAMELY, TORQUE CONVERTERS FOR LAND VEHICLES; HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, HYDRAULIC MOTORS, HYDRAULIC PUMPS, HYDRAULIC VALVES, HYDRAULIC JACKS FOR LIFTING AND LOWERING; PNEUMATIC SUSPENSION SYSTEMS FOR LAND VEHICLES; INTEGRATED SAFETY SYSTEMS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, ALL WHEEL DRIVE TRACTION CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES FULLY INTEGRATED WITH VEHICLE BRAKE SYSTEMS; CRANKCASE VENTILATION SYSTEMS, NAMELY, CRANKCASE BREATHERS; MOTORS AND ENGINES FOR LAND VEHICLES; AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENT PARTS FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | May 24, 1946 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |