USPTO serial 76603668
MOBILE WALLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3263879Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILE WALLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Adams
MICHAEL D. ADAMS MAYER BROWN LLP71 South Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606-4637UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed and stamped plastic and cardboard greeting, blank, note, and index cards; Note paper and envelopes; nametags and labels made from paper or cardboard; notebooks; note pads; stationery; paper, namely, bond paper and art paper; gift-wrap paper; diaries; address books; student calendars; stamp albums and photo-albums; folders for letters and loose papers; stationery clear hole tab reinforcements; rubber stamps and impression stamps; paper weights; letter openers; drawing and ungraduated rulers; erasers; staplers; paper clips; blotting pads; desk file trays; desk stands and holders for holding stationery and office implements; bookmarkers; stencils; scratch pictures; PVC stickers; blackboards; chalk sticks; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; drawing and painting materials, namely, pencils, drawing pencils, pens, drawing pens and pencil cases | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |