USPTO serial 76606585
DR. BRANDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR. BRANDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica W. Stump
Stephanie C. Alvarez, Susan Marsillo, James A. Gal Feldman Gale, P.A.2 South Biscayne BoulevardOne Biscayne Tower, 30th FloorMiami, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | cosmetic bags sold and given away empty and with products in them | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |