Drawing for HERITAGE COLLECTION

USPTO serial 76610532

HERITAGE COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HERITAGE COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin Jordan Harkins

KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS CONLEY ROSE PC5700 GRANITE PKWY STE 330PLANO, TX 75024-6623UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022FIBER FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PILLOWS, CRAFTS, TOYS, AND HOME DECORATIONS; FIBER IN THE SHAPE OF PILLOW FORMS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PILLOWS; AND FIBER BATTING FOR USE IN QUILTSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 1, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 1, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 17, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 20, 2007CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Feb 20, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 16, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 15, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance