CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BLOCKY

USPTO serial 76612707

BLOCKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3128391Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BLOCKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Anti-theft and protective devices for use with eyewear, namely, metal anti-theft devices for eyeglasses, spectacles and sunglasses in the nature of locks, removable and permanent, to prevent theft and protect eyewear, clamps and associated clamping devices for gripping frames to secure eyeglasses, spectacles and sunglassesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
009Anti-theft and protective devices for use with eyewear, namely, electronic anti-theft devices for eyeglasses, spectacles and sunglasses in the nature of locks, removable and permanent, to prevent theft and protect eyewear, clamps and associated clamping devices for gripping frames to secure eyeglasses, spectacles and sunglassesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
020Anti-theft and protective devices for use with eyewear, namely, non-metal anti-theft devices for eyeglasses, spectacles and sunglasses in the nature of locks, removable and permanent, to prevent theft and protect eyewear, clamps and associated clamping devices for gripping frames to secure eyeglasses, spectacles and sunglassesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance