Drawing for AMERICAN COTTAGE

USPTO serial 76615106

AMERICAN COTTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN COTTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger P. Furey

ROGER P FUREY KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NW STE 700EWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5214UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Flooring, namely, wood, thermosetting laminate, thermosetting laminate bonded to a base of particle board or fiberboard and particle board or fiberboard provided with a decorative surface or coatingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 13, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 13, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 21, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 9, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 9, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance