Drawing for E*MERGE

USPTO serial 76615668

E*MERGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with E*MERGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lewis T. Steadman, Jr.

LEWIS T. STEADMAN, JR. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP131 S DEARBORN ST FL 30CHICAGO, IL 60603-5547UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software to create, print and mail advertising and other promotional materials, said software provided via a subscription only web site on the global computer networkABANDONEDMay 15, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Aug 13, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Aug 13, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jan 4, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 14, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 31, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance