Drawing for PROCEUTICAL

USPTO serial 76617698

PROCEUTICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROCEUTICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wesley T. Miller

4922 Santa Anita Ave.El Monte, CA 91731UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, excluding products for the treatment of acneACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 26, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Nov 6, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Oct 30, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 17, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 4, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance