Drawing for SERVICEFIRST

USPTO serial 76619081

SERVICEFIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVICEFIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Emergency communications systems comprised of computer operating software, audio response processors, disk controller boards, hard disk drives, central processing units, ethernet LAN boards, line cards, monochrome/parallel boards, cache controllers, fax cards, tape drives, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE
035Providing marketing plansACTIVE
038Consultation services in the field of voice processing systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 30, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 6, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 6, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 4, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 4, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 3, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance