Drawing for ENGLISH LEATHER

USPTO serial 76619209

ENGLISH LEATHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGLISH LEATHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501-4410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025JACKETS MADE OF LEATHERACTIVESep 8, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 30, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 30, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 8, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 7, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Mar 29, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 15, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 20, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Oct 19, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 18, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED
Oct 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 16, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance