USPTO serial 76619768
WOODHAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOODHAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian L. Belles, Esq.
Brian L. Belles, Esq. The Belles Group, P.C.1608 Walnut Street, Suite 1302Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal ceiling tiles, panels and planks for indoor use | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |