USPTO serial 76620391
INNOVONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNOVONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KENSINGTON, VICTORIA 3031, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brewster Taylor
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRICAL MACHINES AND ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, ELECTRONIC MACHINES AND ELECTRONIC MACHINERY; ROBOTICS, AND ROBOTICS APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT; PARTS, FITTINGS, COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR VEHICLE FLEET MANAGEMENT, INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS AND PASSENGER INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; DESIGN OF ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC AND MECHANICAL DEVICES, APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT; DESIGN OF ROBOTICS, AND DESIGN OF ROBOTICS APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT; INFORMATION AND ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |