Drawing for VAXINNATE

USPTO serial 76621496

VAXINNATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VAXINNATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. DuPré

JOHN L DUPRÉ HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS PCPO BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for anti-allergic applications and purposes; Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of viral and infectious diseases; Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of cancer; Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of auto-immune diseases; Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of degenerative diseases; Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of inflammatory diseases; Vaccine adjuvants; and vaccines for human and animal useACTIVE
042Pharmaceutical research and development services for others; Pharmaceutical product evaluation and research services in the field of molecular biology; Research and development services for vaccine strategies and vaccine effectiveness; and Pharmaceutical testing and evaluation servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Mar 23, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance