USPTO serial 76625985
SUPPLYFOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GENOVESE, CARRIE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPPLYFOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
STEWART L GITLER HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER PC2461 S CLARK STSTE 522 CRYSTAL CTR 2ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus, namely, a software product with applications in authentication, supply chain management, business intelligence,, inventory visibility, retail management, and anticounterfiet areas. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business management and business administration services for others in the field of authentication, anticounterfeit solutions, and inventory based management. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services for others in the filed of business strategy, business analysis, process re-engineering, systems analysis, software development, software design, systems integration, systems products and related areas. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |