USPTO serial 76628223
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MEGA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
North Richland Hills, TX
Other trademarks owned by MEGA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
MEGA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
North Richland Hills, TX
Other trademarks owned by MEGA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
MEGA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
North Richland Hills, TX
Other trademarks owned by MEGA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan N. Greenspan
THE MEGA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY9151 Grapevine HighwayNorth Richland Hills, TX 761804001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promotion of insurance services on behalf of third parties; insurance lead collection and matching services, namely, matching consumer requests for insurance policy quotes collected over the Internet to pre-qualified insurance brokers, agents and agencies interested in those requests ; business organization consulting in the nature of recruiting participation in a network of independent insurance agents and agencies; association services, namely, promotion of business opportunities, namely, promoting the interests of small businesses and the self-employed; development of marketing strategies and concepts for independent insurance agents; business consulting services for independent insurance agents; business consulting services in the field of insurance | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |