Drawing for SW SUPER WOOL

USPTO serial 76628764

SW SUPER WOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SW SUPER WOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GENILDE S. GUERRA

GENILDE S GUERRA LAW OFFICES OF KRAVITZ & GUERRA PA800 BRICKELL AVE#805MIAMI, FL 33131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Covers for baby strollers, vehicle seat covers, all made in whole or substantially in part of woolACTIVE
020Pet products, namely pet beds, sleeping mats, portable beds for pets, all made in whole or substantially in part of woolACTIVE
024Baby products, namely, bath towels; textile products namely bed covers, bed under blankets and sheets, pillow cases, and shams; place mats of textile material; all made in whole or substantially in part of woolACTIVE
027Carpets, rugs, and matting for covering existing floor; bath mats; all made in whole or substantially in part of woolACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Mar 1, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Nov 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Mar 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 6, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance