USPTO serial 76630933
PIXAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIXAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Emeryville, CA
Emeryville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian A. Rupp
Brian A. Rupp The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetCorporate Legal- Trademark DepartmentBurbank, CA 91521-0633Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toy play sets comprising toy figurines and environmental platforms sold as a unit; preschool toys, namely sandbox toys, pull toys, windup toys; infant toys; infant rattles; toy slide projectors, toy slide viewers and accessories; hobby craft kits comprising toy models, modeling clay, paint, plastic and ceramic components; hobby craft kits comprising beads to make jewelry; baby and children's multiple activity toys; plastic toy tea sets; toy bake ware and cookware; wooden toys and tin toys, namely toy vehicles, toy trains, toy houses, toy figures; sport goods and accessories, namely, sport balls, jump ropes, ice skates, skate boards, snow boards; sport equipment, namely snow skis and ski poles; snow sleds for recreational use; surf boards; golf sets; swing sets; water squirting toys and inflatable swimming toys; beach toys, namely beach balls, sand pails, spades, paddle ball games; play swimming pools; inflatable swimming pools; waterslides; educational toys, namely electronic and battery-powered educational toys for children, electronic and battery-powered interactive toys to teach children reading, mathematics, science and other academic skills; construction toys; electronic and non-electronic role play games; yo-yos; bop bags; kites, bubble-making wand and solution sets; sand toys; novelty items and toys, namely, party favors in the nature of small toys; battery-powered toy cell phone with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; toy banks; collectible toy figurines; Christmas tree ornaments and decorations; toy wind socks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | offering multimedia messaging services, namely web messaging, wireless digital messaging, electronic store and forward messaging, delivery of personalized online greeting cards to others via electronic mail, and transmission of video clips, audio clips, and information all intended for use on a consumer's wireless telephone, personal digital assistant (PDA) and other wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |