USPTO serial 76632506
BABY STEPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY STEPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven B. Lehat
STEVEN B LEHAT1025 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1012WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5417UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Charitable services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of volunteer programs and community services projects for youth, disadvantaged children, and parents and distributing course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |