USPTO serial 76632806
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent L. Ramik
VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER, RAMIK & WIGHT7345 MCWHORTER PL STE 101ANNANDALE, VA 22003-5647UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PEDOMETERS AND SPORTS WHISTLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS AND ATHLETICS BAGS; BAGS FOR SPORTS CLOTHING AND GYM BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | INFLATED AND UNINFLATED SPORTS BALLS, BASKETBALLS, FOOTBALLS, SOCCER BALLS, LACROSSE BALLS, VOLLEY BALLS; HOCKEY PUCKS, BASEBALL BASES, BATTING TEES AND PITCHERS RUBBERS, NETS FOR BALL GAMES, INFLATING PUMPS AND NEEDLES FOR PUMPS FOR INFLATING SPORTS EQUIPMENT; FOOTBALL FLAG SETS, MOUTH GUARDS; BASEBALL BALLS/STRIKES/OUTS INDICATORS; FOOTBALL DOWN AND YARDAGE INDICATORS; BASEBALL PLATE BRUSHES; FIELD MARKING AND TRAINING CONES AND DISKS; ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT BAGS, ATHLETIC BALL BAGS, NAMELY, LACROSSE, BASEBALL, SOCCER, FOOTBALL AND BASKETBALL BALL BAGS; RELAY BATONS, SHOT PUT SHOTS AND DISCUSES; LEG, HAND, WRIST, FOREARM,KNEE, SHIN AND CHEST PROTECTORS AND ATHLETIC PROTECTIVE PADS; BLOCKING DUMMIES; PROTECTIVE SCRIMMAGE VESTS, PROTECTIVE LINE-UP SCRIMMAGE VESTS; AND ATHLETIC TAPES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |