Drawing for FIELDHOUSE

USPTO serial 76632806

FIELDHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIELDHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent L. Ramik

VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER, RAMIK & WIGHT7345 MCWHORTER PL STE 101ANNANDALE, VA 22003-5647UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PEDOMETERS AND SPORTS WHISTLESACTIVE
018ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS AND ATHLETICS BAGS; BAGS FOR SPORTS CLOTHING AND GYM BAGSACTIVE
028INFLATED AND UNINFLATED SPORTS BALLS, BASKETBALLS, FOOTBALLS, SOCCER BALLS, LACROSSE BALLS, VOLLEY BALLS; HOCKEY PUCKS, BASEBALL BASES, BATTING TEES AND PITCHERS RUBBERS, NETS FOR BALL GAMES, INFLATING PUMPS AND NEEDLES FOR PUMPS FOR INFLATING SPORTS EQUIPMENT; FOOTBALL FLAG SETS, MOUTH GUARDS; BASEBALL BALLS/STRIKES/OUTS INDICATORS; FOOTBALL DOWN AND YARDAGE INDICATORS; BASEBALL PLATE BRUSHES; FIELD MARKING AND TRAINING CONES AND DISKS; ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT BAGS, ATHLETIC BALL BAGS, NAMELY, LACROSSE, BASEBALL, SOCCER, FOOTBALL AND BASKETBALL BALL BAGS; RELAY BATONS, SHOT PUT SHOTS AND DISCUSES; LEG, HAND, WRIST, FOREARM,KNEE, SHIN AND CHEST PROTECTORS AND ATHLETIC PROTECTIVE PADS; BLOCKING DUMMIES; PROTECTIVE SCRIMMAGE VESTS, PROTECTIVE LINE-UP SCRIMMAGE VESTS; AND ATHLETIC TAPESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 30, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 12, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 12, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance