Drawing for NATURES BLEND

USPTO serial 76633053

NATURES BLEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3352866Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURES BLEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ezra Sutton

BACK TO NATURE INC535 KINGS HIGHWAYBROOKLYN, NY 11223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030SALAD DRESSINGS AND SPICESSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDOct 15, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2012C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
May 1, 2012CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 13, 2012CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Dec 13, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 26, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Sep 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 7, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance