USPTO serial 76635308
OPTIMAL HEALTH THROUGH GENETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMAL HEALTH THROUGH GENETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy J. Pifher
WENDY J PIFHER HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | BIOCHEMISTRY RESEARCH SERVICES; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, HUMAN GENETIC PROFILING TO ESTABLISH NUTRITION AND LIFESTYLE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERVICES; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELDS OF NUTRITION AND HEALTH CARE; BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH; BIOTECHNOLOGY TESTING; COLLECTION OF DATA DERIVED FROM CLINICAL TRIALS IN THE FIELDS OF GENETICS, NUTRITION, LIFESTYLE AND HEALTH CARE; COMPILATION OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF GENETICS, NUTRITION, LIFESTYLE AND HEALTH CARE; PREPARATION OF REPORTS RELATING TO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; RESEARCH RELATING TO MOLECULAR SCIENCES; GENETICS RESEARCH; PROVISION OF RESEARCH SERVICES, NAMELY, HUMAN GENETIC PROFILING TO ESTABLISH NUTRITION AND LIFESTYLE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; AND PROVISION OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, NAMELY, HUMAN GENETIC PROFILING TO ESTABLISH NUTRITION AND LIFESTYLE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | ADVISORY SERVICES, NAMELY, ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO DIET; ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO HEALTH; ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO NUTRITION; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO NUTRITION; FOOD NUTRITION CONSULTATION; COUNSELING RELATING TO NUTRITION; GENETIC TESTING, NAMELY, HUMAN GENETIC PROFILING TO ESTABLISH NUTRITION AND LIFESTYLE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANCY RELATING TO HEALTH; AND PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANCY RELATING TO HEALTH CARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sciona, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sciona, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named OPTIMAL HEALTH THROUGH GENETICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |