Drawing for AYRQUEST

USPTO serial 76638506

AYRQUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AYRQUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph V. Colaianni

JOSEPH V. COLAIANNI PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M STREETN.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telematic products, namely motor vehicle drive information systems consisting of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors and software providing vehicular mapping and directions to an operator of a vehicle, vehicle data bus communications, control algorithms, diagnostic algorithmsABANDONED
039providing real time road routing services, namely locator assistance through travel direction and navigational and instrumentation components all interacting with global positioning system satellite technology and a customer call centerABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 20, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 20, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Feb 12, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 13, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 30, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED
Jun 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance