USPTO serial 76639102
BARON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BARON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kanagawa-ken, JP
Kanagawa-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W. LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLCTHE JENIFER BUILDING400 SEVENTH STREETWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, namely, office furniture, school furniture, furniture for house, chairs, armchairs, desks, tables, lockers, index cabinets, filing cabinets, shelves for filing-cabinets, racks, display racks, screens, shelves for storage, stools, sofas, seats, benches, sideboards, chests of drawers, showcases, sales and display counters, furniture partitions, furniture of metal | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |