USPTO serial 76639169
ATLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Albert Richardson
H ALBERT RICHARDSON BLACK LOWE & GRAHAM PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104-7009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software to aid in interpreting medical imaging examinations permitting the user to match graphical representations of anatomic structures and pathologic findings with the medical images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |