Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76639236?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76639236. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns TASTE CHICAGO?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76639236, the listed owner(s) include: MANTEGNA, ARLENE V..

What is USPTO serial number 76639236?

Serial number 76639236 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark TASTE CHICAGO. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover TASTE CHICAGO?

The public record lists International Classes: 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76639236

TASTE CHICAGO

Q: What is the current status of TASTE CHICAGO?

TASTE CHICAGO (76639236) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: May 23, 2005
Status date: Jul 2, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TASTE CHICAGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

MANTEGNA, ARLENE V.
Burbank, CA
Other trademarks owned by MANTEGNA, ARLENE V.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH R. EVANNS

JOSEPH R EVANNS EVANNS & WALSH119 N SAN VICENTE BLVDBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211-2300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
043	restaurant services, with takeout services	ACTIVE	Jun 25, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 2, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jul 2, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jul 2, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 4, 2007	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Sep 4, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 4, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 14, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Aug 14, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 17, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jul 12, 2007	PGTT	PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
Apr 17, 2007	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Mar 2, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Mar 2, 2007	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Mar 2, 2007	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Feb 20, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 24, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 21, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 21, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 19, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 3, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—