Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76639252?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76639252. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SAND GUZZLER?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76639252, the listed owner(s) include: Tibban, James A..

What is USPTO serial number 76639252?

Serial number 76639252 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SAND GUZZLER. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover SAND GUZZLER?

The public record lists International Classes: 007. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76639252

SAND GUZZLER

Q: What is the current status of SAND GUZZLER?

SAND GUZZLER (76639252) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: May 23, 2005
Status date: Dec 1, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: KEAN, AMY C
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAND GUZZLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Tibban, James A.
Apple Valley, CA
Other trademarks owned by Tibban, James A.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael I. Kroll

MICHAEL I KROLL171 STILLWELL LNSYOSSET, NY 11791-1913UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	EARTH MOVING AND SAND SORTING MACHINERY, NAMELY, MUD PUMPS, WELL DRILLING MACHINES, AND MUD AND SAND SEPARATOR TANKS	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 3, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 1, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 1, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 14, 2007	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
May 4, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	—
May 4, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Apr 3, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jan 26, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 26, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 16, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 26, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 22, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 22, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 3, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—