USPTO serial 76639297
CLEARCONCEPT ACNE CENTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275877Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEARCONCEPT ACNE CENTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
CARROLLTON, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott L. Harper
SCOTT L HARPER CARSTENS & CAHOON LLPPO BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Dermatologic services in the field of dermatology involving lasers and intense pulse light for the treatment of acne and other skin conditions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-Surge Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-Surge Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-Surge Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BELLEDERM SKINCARE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CLEARCONCEPT ACNE CENTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |