USPTO serial 76639400
HEATS PURE ENERGY DRINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEATS PURE ENERGY DRINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | ENERGY DRINK WITH DIFFERENT FLAVORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |