Drawing for ASHLEY B BERNARDO

USPTO serial 76639475

ASHLEY B BERNARDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, JASON E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASHLEY B BERNARDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Moskin, Christopher Glancy, Carol Witschel, Marc Ackerman, Jennifer Co

JONATHAN MOSKIN, CHRISTOPHER GLANCY, CAR WHITE & CASE LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025(Based on Use in Commerce) Clothing, namely, dresses, sweaters, suits, pants, jeans, vests, tops, shirts, shorts, blazers, and skorts; outerwear, namely, jackets and vests; (Based on Intent to Use) Clothing, namely, swim wear, hats, belts, ties, scarves; outerwear, namely, coats, raincoats, and wind-resistant jacketsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 20, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 12, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 24, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 6, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 17, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 17, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 17, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 25, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED
Jun 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance