USPTO serial 76639512
ROHRBAUGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROHRBAUGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce L. Adams
BRUCE L ADAMS ADAMS & WILKS50 BROADWAY FL 31NEW YORK, NY 10004-1694UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Firearms, namely, handguns, revolvers, pistols, and rifles; and firearm cases | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |