USPTO serial 76639651
JUNK ADDICT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUNK ADDICT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Miami Beach, FL
North Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Ioannou, Jr.
JOHN IOANNOU JR IOANNOU & IOANNOU LLP8821 SW 8TH STFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33324-3715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated hair care products, namely, hair gel, hair creme, hair pomade, hair grease, wax strips for removing body hair, hair oil, and shampoo and conditioner for hair | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |