USPTO serial 76639841
STP CONTROL ARCHITECTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3166854Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2006
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STP CONTROL ARCHITECTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEIKO P. MEYENSCHEIN
HEIKO P. MEYENSCHEIN ROSENSTEEL LAW40 Wall Street33RD FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SmartStream Technologies Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SmartStream Technologies Group Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STP CONTROL ARCHITECTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |