Drawing for I.METER

USPTO serial 76639870

I.METER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I.METER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

EDWARD D LANQUIST JR WADDEY & PATTERSON PC1600 DIVISION ST STE 500ROUNDABOUT PLAZANASHVILLE, TN 37203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009power meter used for power utility distributionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 19, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 9, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance