USPTO serial 76640012
APPLE PIE SHOPPING CART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEWIS, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APPLE PIE SHOPPING CART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, creation, hosting and maintenance of websites for others featuring electronic commerce services | ABANDONED | Aug 8, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2006 | ISIC | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |