Drawing for GRIDNET BROADBAND

USPTO serial 76640019

GRIDNET BROADBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIDNET BROADBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher S. Beer

CHRISTOPHER S BEER IRONMARK LAW GROUP PLLC2311 N 45TH ST STE 365SEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; Telecommunications and data networking software, namely, software for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocolsACTIVE
038Providing access to telecommunications data networks for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; Telecommunications consultation for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; Transfer of data by telecommunications, namely, transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications via telecommunication networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 9, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance