USPTO serial 76640208
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Hosmer
James T. Hosmer NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 North Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, CURTAINS; BED AND TABLE COVERS; BATH LINEN; BATH TOWELS; BED BLANKETS; BED CANOPIES; BED LINEN; BED SHEETS; BED SPREADS; BLANKET THROWS; BUCKRAM; CLOTH FLAGS; CLOTH LABELS; CLOTH NAPKINS FOR REMOVING MAKEUP; COMFORTERS; COTTON FABRIC; COVERLETS; COVERS FOR CUSHIONS; CURTAIN FABRIC; DUVET COVERS; DUVETS; FABRIC FLAGS; FABRIC OF IMITATION ANIMAL SKIN; FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS; FABRIC TABLE TOPPERS; FIBERGLASS FABRIC FOR TEXTILE USE; FLANNEL; GAUZE FABRIC; HAND TOWELS OF TEXTILE; HANDKERCHIEFS; HOUSEHOLD LINEN; KITCHEN TOWELS; LAP RUGS; LINEN FABRIC; MATTRESS COVERS; NET CURTAINS; OIL CLOTHS; PILLOW CASES; PILLOW COVERS; PRINTED TEXTILE LABELS; QUILTS; RECEIVING BLANKETS; SACKCLOTH; SHOWER CURTAINS; TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER; TABLE LINEN; TABLE LINEN, NAMELY, NAPKINS, PLACE MATS; TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER; TAPESTRIES OF TEXTILE; TEA TOWELS; TEXTILE LININGS FOR GARMENTS; TEXTILE NAPKINS; TEXTILE NAPKINS FOR REMOVING MAKEUP; TEXTILE PLACE MATS; TEXTILE USED AS LINING FOR CLOTHING; TEXTILE WALL HANGINGS; TOWELS; TULLE; UPHOLSTERY FABRICS; AND WINDOW CURTAINS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |