Drawing for EGEA

USPTO serial 76640346

EGEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EGEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurence S. Rickles

LAURENCE S RICKLES JOHNSON & JOHNSONONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-7001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001biological and chemical materials, namely, oligoneucleotides, polynucleotides, peptides and polypeptides for use in scientific and medical researchACTIVE
005biological and chemical materials, namely, products derived from living sources in the nature of vaccines, blood and blood derivatives, monoclonal antibodies, and products derived from recombinant DNA, for use in therapeutics and diagnosticsACTIVE
042biological and chemical research in the nature of synthesis of biological and chemical materials; product design for others in the field of synthesis of biological and chemical materialsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance