USPTO serial 76640500
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EASTERN CONNECTICUT REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICT
NEW LONDON, CT
Other trademarks owned by EASTERN CONNECTICUT REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICT
NORWICH, CT
NORWICH, CT
EASTERN CONNECTICUT REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICT
NEW LONDON, CT
Other trademarks owned by EASTERN CONNECTICUT REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICT
Eastern Connecticut Tourism District
New London, CT
Other trademarks owned by Eastern Connecticut Tourism District
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert W. Hilburger
ALBERT W HILBURGER10 SPINNAKER DRNIANTIC, CT 06357-1611UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TOURISM DISTRICT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING TOURISM INTO THE EASTERN CONNECTICUT AREA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |